Thursday, 28 June 2007

Teamwork Soedan

,,Weet je wie vernieuwend bezig zijn? Die jongens en meisjes van Soedan.” Nieuwsgierig geworden van die opmerking, sprak ik met Mark van Dorp, relatiebeheerder Soedan. Want was is er zo nieuw aan hun werkwijze? Om te beginnen, legt Mark uit, werkt hij met een collega in Utrecht en twee in Soedan als één team, dat gezamenlijk alle besluiten neemt. ,,Wat vroeger intercollegiale toetsing was (waarbij je soms letterlijk je naaste collega passeerde), doen we nu als team. En dat bevalt uitstekend.” Daarnaast gaan ze vrij pragmatisch om met in Utrecht bedachte plannen: ,,We trainen niet alleen ngo’s, ook lokale bestuurders. Dat valt buiten het mandaat, maar als je het niet doet, komt er niets van de grond.”
,,Na het sluiten van het vredesakkoord trok de halve ngo-wereld zich terug, met het idee dat de overheid het werk zou overnemen. Dat gebeurde natuurlijk niet. Zuid-Soedan begint een vergeten ramp te worden, nu iedereen zich op Darfur richt. In die context besloten we dat we meer ‘field presence’ moesten hebben en we stuurden Jan Jaap Verboom. Al snel bleek ons doel –een sterk D&V-programma – in Soedan niet erg realistisch. Er bleek behoefte aan basisvoorzieningen. Wij vroegen ons af: waar zijn we mee bezig? We willen kostte wat kost een D&V-programma, we sturen er iemand heen, gaat die basisvoorzieningen zitten doen! We besloten niet in thema’s te denken, maar een overkoepelend programma op te zetten voor iets dat ICCO goed kan: het versterken van de civil society, de opbouw van kennis en local ownership, indienen van aanvragen bij de Europese Unie.”
,,Het innovatieve is dat we niet droog workshops en trainingen geven, maar dat lokale ngo’s meewerken en ín een project vaardigheden opdoen. Dat zie je niet vaak, want dat wordt beschouwd als het vermengen van de rollen van funding en capacity building. Het zijn vaak jonge jongens met leuke ideeën, maar ze missen nog veel vaardigheden zoals het opstellen van een visie en boekhoudkunde. Wij zijn een soort mentor.. Neem onze partner Scope. Zij hebben een vocational training centre voor jongeren, die leren stenen bakken, meubels maken en andere technische vaardigheden. Het is niet gebruikelijk dat ngo’s zélf opleiden, meestal schakelen ze daar weer een ander voor in. Maar Scope haalde binnen een jaar haar eerste eigen financiering binnen, terwijl we ze aanvankelijk te zwak vonden om mee in zee te gaan. Dat we het toch deden en dat het slaagt, daar word ik heel blij van.”

Nog niet duidelijk? Meer weten? Vraag het mark.van.dorp@icco.nl

What's -in- the name?

Knowledge Centre Democratisation and Peacebuilding kick-off
June 26 2007

It finally happened! After months and months of waiting, thinking, and meeting up now and then, the knowledge centre on Democratisation and Peacebuilding issues will get started. The participating members of the network are Cordaid, IKV/PaxChristi and ICCO/Kerkinactie. That’s just for now, probably more members will join when the knowledge centre will be a bit more settled in our organisations. Because that is what it is all about; the centre should strengthen the work of our organisations, as well as in the Netherlands as in the South. The other function of the centre is to ‘pick up’ interesting topics, circulating in the ‘world’ of D&V. The attending employees of the members of the centre were enthusiastic, although much has to be said yet about the topics the centre will discuss. The list ranges from issues like Counter Terrorism Measures to Identity and Conflict. The next step for the centre is to determine a research list and to develop a website to share information on these issues. But; first of all, we need a name! Any good ideas?

Gender dimensions of post-conflict reconstruction

One of the challenges I face as an advisor on gender and partner policy is how to interweave a gender perspective at various levels in ICCO's programmes: from the conceptual level to the practical implementation level, and within a variety of themes.

A useful report I recently set my eyes on is "The Gender Dimensions of Post-Conflict Reconstruction. The Challenges in Development Aid" (by Marcia E. Greenberg and Elaine Zuckerman). It gave me ideas on how to systematically address gender issues and promote gender equality to make peacebuilding work. I would love to share the document with whoever is interested.

It argues that achieving successful reconstruction and maintaining peace requires attention to gender in the post-conflict arena. The framework proposed consists of three interrelated essential gender dimensions: (i) women-focused activities, (ii) gender-aware programming, and (iii) gender role transformation to heal trauma, build social capital and avoid further violence.

Read the paper.

By Janet Rodenburg

Monday, 25 June 2007

Human Rights and ICCO's Learning Programme

If there is one truth in working on rights-issues, it is that cooperation is indispensable: individual organisations – in the South or the North - cannot realistically hope to achieve much by themselves.

Especially in the field of Economic, Social and Cultural rights (ESC-rights), more and more experience and insight is being gained in the struggle to gain recognition of these rights. Experience shows that information-gathering and analysis of decision-making processes, (both local and international e.g. the machinery of the UN), lobbying at local and international level with the results of this analysis, and defining joint strategies (for example in preparing parallel reports) is sharpening NGO-agenda’s.

All of this requires actively seeking complementarity and extremely agile information-sharing across continents and specific fields of ESC-rights. Good examples of where that can lead is in the broad and empowering process involving many local NGO’s in the preparation of a parallel report, (as in the case of Brazil) and the preparation, under discussion now, of an international database and monitoring system for the Right to Food.

ICCO's active membership in the International Network for Economic, Social & Cultural Rights, and other examples point to the growing influence of multi-partner initiatives to ‘make rights real’ also show that the human rights movement cannot do without effective, flexible tools for communication and joint learning.

We have foud that the use of Dgroups greatly helped participative preparation of nearly 60 human rights activities organised by more than 80 organisations from four continents during the World Social Forum in January of this year: a sub-group of 25 organisations used the same mechanism for organising specific gender-related HR-activities.

More and more, the results of research, among others to understand the implications of judgements by regional Courts of Human Rights and UN-institutions and their mechanism is becoming available. We will also need systems to disseminate and work on the insights gained and translate them into increasing institutional capacities to effectively occupy the space available.

This will be one of the main challenges for the short term in which ICCO needs to combine the efforts of it Capacity-building and Knowledge units, with our programme specialists and related partners in South and North. One example of such an effort going on right now is to define how we will participate in building the monitoring system for the Right to Food.

by Pim Verhallen

Thursday, 21 June 2007

KM4dev workshop 2007

KM4dev is a community of practice about Knowledge Management for Development. It has about 800 members from all over the world, although mainly form the US/Canada and Europe. Since I joined this community somewhere in 2005 I really learnt very much from all discussions and information generated on the list and its wiki .

Creativity in presentations

Once a year the community organises a face to face workshop. In 2006 I participated for the first time and really got thrilled. It is so inspiring to talk and share experiences with peers and work together on developing new insights and learning new ways of working. That was the reason that I joined the ad-hoc organising committee for the 2007 workshop which was held the past days in Zeist, The Netherlands (sponsored by ETC, PSO, IICD, IRC, Hivos and ICCO). Also this time it was a very inspiring meeting in which again I learnt a lot, I met many interesting people and I received an overwhelming quantity of useful information. I am sure all these lessons and wise advices will be useful for our work, and you can be sure I will use them and try to make them accessible to all of you as far as you are interested. But as an overall impression I really got the impression that we are “on the right way” with our CDP within the ICCO-Alliance, and for me that is really motivating.

You can find more information on the workshop on its
blog and on the KM4dev-wiki mentioned above. Although I must admit this wiki is not a very good example because it is not very accessible ;-), plans to improve the wiki have been made though! Therefore here the direct links to two concrete examples of the results on Benchmarking and on Graffic Facilitation.

Monday, 18 June 2007

Feasibility of health insurance schemes in West Africa

This short paper was written by Gerrit de Vries, ICCO programme specialist on Healthcare, as part of a course with the Royal Tropical Institute (May 2007). The paper is quite relevant as ICCO is further developing its work on health insurance via the HIP, Health Insurance Platform, set up in 2006. Other HIP members are: other NGOs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, insurance companies and knowledge institutes.

The paper – "Feasibility of Health Insurance Schemes in very low income countries: focus on four West-African countries" explores the feasibility of (community) health Insurance in very low income countries.

It is based on a literature review. Studies of four West African countries - Ghana, Burkina Faso, Guinea-Conakry, and Senegal - were gathered to provide evidence related to the topic. Evidence from these four countries was analysed focusing on financial feasibility, enrolment, and administrative capacity.

The conclusion of the paper is that community health insurance is an important way to finance health care and improve access in low-income countries, as well as to provide financial protection. However health insurance, and more specifically community health insurance, will only be feasible provided a few aspects are taken into account:
  • Administrative capacity of the schemes should be improved, e.g. by providing technical assistance or other forms of capacity building.
  • Ownership of the schemes has to be taken seriously.
  • Schemes are developed bottom-up. Small, localised schemes should first be established and working, before trying to scale up to regional or national levels.
  • Measures are implemented to avoid moral hazard and adverse selection. It was shown that such measures, such as co-payments and probation periods, are easy to implement.
  • Measures are taken to enrol even the poorest of the poor. Such measures can include more flexible payment systems, e.g. not paying at once but in several instalments, or (partial) exemptions for the poorest.
Read the report.

The synopsis was prepared by Justine Anschütz to help make ICCO sponsored 'research' more accessible

Baseline study on conflict transformation

This 2007 study by Irma Specht assesses the strengths and weaknesses of ICCO's work on Conflict Transformation in Africa and the Middle East. It provides a baseline for ICCO and its partners to improve their work on country specific Conflict Transformation and to measure its impact at local, provincial, national and international levels.

The purpose of this baseline study, as formulated in the TOR is to:
  1. Provide a systematic and critical overview of ICCO's current efforts and results in the field of Conflict Transformation in Africa and the Middle East. This overview should pay special attention to the efforts and results of faith based organizations.
  2. To make an inventory of the indicators used by ICCO and its partners and to suggest improved indicators for monitoring our future efforts in the field of Conflict Transformation in the period 2007-2010.
The study is based on ICCO country files from Burundi, DRCongo, Uganda, Liberia, Sudan and the Middle East. Two locations, Israel/Palestine and Karamoja in Northeast Uganda were visited for in-depth field research.

Interesting features of the study

Chapter 2 gives an overview of literature on conflict transformation. Chapter 3 gives a list of possible indicators for conflict transformation (output and outcome/impact level). The author has found that impact indicators are often missing in ICCO funded conflict transformation projects.

In Chapter 4 (assessment of ICCO's partners and ICCO-funded activities) the author found that the conflict analyses were often too short and not detailed enough. She recommended that the capacities of ICCO partners to look further and deeper by built up, even if they are addressing a local conflict solving direct causes. Also she recommended that the conflict analyses are more based on a consultative process with partners in the South.

The author states that in some ICCO funded projects there is too much stress on seminars and conferences. Section 4.3 provides a list of possible conflict transformation activities.

The author evaluated the partners she visited in Uganda and Israel/Palestine regarding their work on three levels main leves of Conflict transformation:
  • Behaviour (e.g. violence, destruction, versus peaceful coexistence, dialogue)
  • Attitudes/perceptions (e.g. hatred, mistrust, suspicion versus faith, trust)
  • Structural causes (e.g. inequality, marginalization, corruption versus development, justice and equality for all citizens)
According to the author, ICCO and its partners especially need to reinforce their work on the structural causes. She considered one of the strengths of current approaches to be ICCO's ability to work across religious barriers and to play a role in reconciling people from different religious backgrounds.

The concluding chapter elaborates on the role of religion, gender and youth in conflict transformation. The report ends with recommendations for conflict transformation strategy of ICCO and for organisational restructuring.

Read the report.

The synopsis was prepared by Justine Anschütz to help make ICCO sponsored 'research' more accessible

Saturday, 16 June 2007

Adding value in Kyrgyzstan agriculture

This 2007 report by Eugene Ryazanov for ICCO and Helvetas examines how farmers, processors, and traders in Kyrgyzstan can set up a win-win situation in the fruit and vegetable production and processing sectors.

The booklet aims to analyse added value at different stages of the chain and possible ways of cooperation and business development of all the actors and supporters involved and it can also be used as a reference for market information. The main readers of the booklet are expected to be people involved in development cooperation working with agricultural producers, processors and traders.

The booklet is based on experiences gained in the Local Market Development Project in Kyrgyzstan, funded by ICCO and Helvetas Kyrgyzstan. The first phase of the project lasted from 2005 to 2006, the second phase from 2006 to 2008. The project focuses on 4 'oblasts' (districts), includes 10 value chains and targets 2000 farmers, mainly marginal and disadvantaged groups like resource-poor farmers, ethnic minorities and women.

The booklet contains three chapters. The first chapter analyses added value in eight selected value chains related to crops grown in Kyrgyzstan, namely: early potatoes, late potatoes, wheat, raw fibre cotton, ginned cotton, oil and cake, tomatoes, cucumbers and cabbages.

The second chapter focuses on ways of increasing added value at different stages of the value chain: at farmer, processor and trader level.

The third chapter has some recommendations on effective approaches and possible tools for the development of value chain actors. The provided approaches and tools are those that have actually been used by the Local Market Development Project and its partners for several years in Kyrgyzstan.

Read the report.

The synopsis was prepared by Justine Anschütz to help make ICCO sponsored 'research' more accessible

Friday, 15 June 2007

Microfinance systems in the Philippines

This October 2006 country study of microfinance in the Philippines was conducted by Ma. Piedad S. Geron in the context of MICRONED, an alliance of ICCO, Hivos, CORDAID and Oxfam/Novib around microfinance activities.

The study is structured in the following way: Chapter 1: The Philippines: general overview, geographical, economic growth, population and employment, poverty situation; Chapter 2: The Philippine financial system, types of financial institutions; Chapter 3: The Philippine microfinance sector, about the microfinance policy environment, the demand and supply of microfinance services, donor support to the microfinance sector, priority needs and support gap to the MFIs ; Chapter 4: Meso-level support to microfinance, about the meso level supporters, needs and support gaps at the sector level; Chapter 5: Conclusion and recommendations, regarding three types of support: to clients of microfinance services, to the MFI sector, to networks, associations and federations

Table 3 in Section 3.1 presents some key policy measures on microfinance taken in the Philippines:

In Section 3.2 (Demand and supply of microfinance services) it is stated that demand not always matches supply. Most microfinance service suppliers prefer to provide services to those already engaged in some form of entrepreneurial activity. So many poor do not have access to microfinance. Very few MFIs provide start up funds for clients. Women comprise more than three fourths of the clients of microfinance institutions in the Philippines.

The study gives information on the three major types of institutions involved in microfinance in the Philippines: microfinance NGOs, cooperatives, and banks (rural and thrift banks). It presents their activities, total loan portfolio and number of clients. It also provides some judgement on their maturity and quality of operations. In the Philippines NGOs serve the highest number of clients and have the largest portfolio.

In Section 3.3 (Donor support to the microfinance sector) Official Development Assistance for microfinance is addressed and the portfolio of Dutch institutions in microfinance in the Philippines is presented, including amounts invested by Cordaid, ICCO, OxfamNovib, Rabobank Foundation, FMO, Oikocredit, and DOEN Foundation in 2002-2005.

In Section 3.4 (Priority needs and support gap to the MFIs) the kind of current donor support is summarised and gaps for future support are identified:
  • Assistance in developing new products that meet the changing demands of current and prospective clients;
  • Using technology based systems (e.g. use of cellphone based technology in payments and use of Personal Digital Assistant in recording loan payments) in lending operations;
  • Development of savings products appropriate to the needs of the poor;
  • Provision of insurance and microinsurnace services;
  • Provision of services to accommodate Remittances from Overseas Filipino Workers;
The study also provides a description of various meso level supporters (section 4.1), such as associations of banks engaged in microfinance, federations of cooperatives, and training service providers, involved in promoting best practice, acting as lobby group, providing capability building to their member-institutions. It identifies needs at this meso level as well, for example (section 4.2):

• Improving the credit information system for microfinance clients
• Improving financial literacy among users of microfinance
• Development of a microfinance database and indicator system for monitoring purposes

Read the report.

The synopsis was prepared by Justine Anschütz to help make ICCO sponsored 'research' more accessible

Thursday, 7 June 2007

'Forgotten and marginalized' - Displaced persons in Khartoum

This February 2006 report - 'Forgotten and marginalized' - Displaced persons in Khartoum: One year after the peace agreement' was written by Rik Delhaas for ICCO.

Sudan has experienced the worst population displacement in the world: six million internally displaced persons (IDPs) out of a total population of 37 million people. Two million of the internally displaced persons live in official IDP camps, squatter areas or relocation sites in and outside the capital Khartoum, in northern Sudan. This report explores the situation of these two million IDPs, one year after the government of Sudan and the southern rebel movement SPLM/A signed a Comprehensive Peace Agreement.

The report is based on previous research and some interviews. It is not set up as a research report, in the sense that it does not include a research question or clear information about the methodology used. The last part is more like a pamphlet, urging the Sudanese authorities and international donor community to take certain actions. ICCO has used it for its lobbying efforts. The report provides some interesting figures and illustrations, among others a map of IDP camps in Khartoum State.

The findings in this research suggest that the administration of Khartoum State has not just economic motives for demolishing and relocating the IDP-camps. It also uses relocations as a method of discouraging people from legitimately settling themselves in Khartoum. The government of South-Sudan, in turn, lacks sufficient influence in northern policies and thus cannot interfere. It furthermore has electoral interests in having the southern IDPs returned to their places of origin in the South. Apparently, none of the authorities care for the welfare of IDPs living in and around Khartoum.

As a result of continuing demolitions and relocations to sites far outside Khartoum the situation of these IDPs has deteriorated. In all the camps, sufficient basic services such as health-clinics, water-facilities, latrines and job opportunities are lacking. Many IDPs have lost their jobs, because they cannot afford transport costs to Khartoum. Child malnutrition and mortality are high among the IDPs. Additionally, IDPs are prevented from organizing themselves and from collectively demanding improvement of their situation. In short, circumstances in the camps around Khartoum are dire. Even the IDPs in Darfur are better off, according to Special Representative of Secretary-General Jan Pronk.

Read the report.

The synopsis was prepared by Justine Anschütz to help make ICCO sponsored 'research' more accessible

Tuesday, 5 June 2007

Performance and impact monitoring support to local market partners in Ethiopia

This 2006 report by Ben Haagsma is from a mission of IC/Consult to Ethiopia to assist two organisations -SHDI and NGO Cereal Banks Consortium- to improve their monitoring systems and their baseline studies.

SHDI provides capacity building of agricultural cooperatives and unions, while the NGO Cereal Banks Consortium helps farmers to set up cereal banks. Both organisations focus on promoting access to markets for small producers.

The report is structured in 7 chapters: Chapter 1 introduced the background and objectives of the mission; Chapter 2 clarifies terminology, monitoring for proving and improving, formal and informal monitoring; Chapter 3 provides the outcomes of a joint workshop; Chapter 4 gives detailed information on the systems of the Cereals Bank Consortium; Chapter 5 outlines monitoring systems of SHDI; Chapter 6 contains reflection and discussion; while Chapter 7 outlines some next steps.

In Chapter 2 the author presents some perceived differences between monitoring to 'prove' something (accountability) and to 'improve' something (learning). For example a survey can both provide average values, e.g. average amount of potatoes produced per year, and extreme values, the range from the lowest to the highest amount. The author argues that the average is most interesting for proving/accountability, while the extreme values are more interesting for improving/learning.

The report contains some interesting feedback on the content of questionnaires (sections 4.3 and 5.4) and on sample sizes for surveys (section 3.8).

Section 6.3 provide some interesting insights on the importance of participation in monitoring, both of target groups and within NGOs themselves.

Read the report.

The synopsis was prepared by Justine Anschütz to help make ICCO sponsored 'research' more accessible

Saturday, 2 June 2007

Transforming youth gangs into civil society organisations in Central America

Sarah Dobbe of CIDIN recently wrote a paper on "Transforming Youth Gangs. The Possibilities of Transforming Youth Gangs into Civil Society Organisations" (November 2005).

The main research question she asks is: "How can youth gangs in Central America be transformed into civil society organisations, and what lessons can ICCO learn from this analysis?" The report answers this question through answering the following sub-questions:
  • What are the processes behind the formation of youth gangs and the occurrence of gang violence?
  • What are civil society organisations?
  • How do youth gangs differ from civil society organisations?
  • How can these differences between youth gangs and civil society organisations be reduced?
  • What recommendations can be made to ICCO with regard to transforming youth gangs into civil society organisations?
The study is structured around 4 chapters: Chapter 1: Introduction, research questions, methodology; Chapter 2: Fiction meets Reality (perceptions of youth gangs); Chapter 3: How to continue (transformation of youth gangs into CSO's); Chapter 4: Recommendations.

Section 2.2 analyses some of the important processes behind the formation of youth gangs and the occurrence of gang violence. Section 2.3 describes how youth gangs are perceived with regard to violence, and what implications this has on gangs, youth and gang violence. The popular views on youth gangs and gang violence are contested by describing alternative ways to look upon gangs. It is also described where these popular perceptions originate from.

Chapter 3 looks at how youth gangs differ from civil society organisations (CSO's) and how these differences can be reduced. The most important existing intervention strategies are analysed in the light of reducing these differences, and their potential in facilitating the transformation of youth gangs into CSO's. Section 3.3 suggests what is needed to make the transformation happen; the author also provides some recommendations to ICCO.

Read the report.

The synopsis was prepared by Justine Anschütz to help make ICCO sponsored 'research' more accessible